-I think you will run into the fact that tables are blocks on disk. I have no idea how gluster would handle a table bigger than a brick? Probably it means all your reads will be non-local unless you happen to be on the server that has the brick for the file.
-But then again, with a clever slave configuration, maybe there is a way to leverage gluster for durability as well as the local file system for other tasks? On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Targino Silveira <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Suvendu, > > I have used Gluster to store old data in PostgreSQL database, the access > for this data was very good, but was old data, the recent data was store in > SAS Disk because permance. > > Regards, > > Targino Silveira > +55-85-8626-7297 > www.twitter.com/targinosilveira > > > 2014-02-11 3:57 GMT-02:00 Suvendu Mitra <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> We are planning to run glusterfs on openstack based VM cluster, I >> understood that gluster replication is based on file level. What is the >> drawback of running RDBMS on gluster >> >> -- >> Suvendu Mitra >> GSM - +358504821066 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- Jay Vyas http://jayunit100.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
