>From memory, support to ACLs, SElinux, but I could be wrong.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jay Vyas <[email protected]> wrote: > Are there any other requirements other than xattr support? Would be cool > to find ever kernel fs impl and test them automatically on a server (maybe > our rack space nodes) somewhere for a series of known gluster requirements. > > On Apr 2, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Apostolos Manolitzas < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > as far as I can see, from the UBIFS Faq > http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html#L_xattr > > UBIFS supports extended attributes if the corresponding configuration > option is enabled (no additional mount options are required). It supports > the user, trusted, and security name-spaces. However, access control > lists (ACL) support is not implemented. > > beyond that, no clue if it's working. > > -Apostolos > > On 04/02/2014 02:41 PM, Carlos Capriotti wrote: > > Hi. > > i am not very familiar with those filesystems you mentioned, but as a > rule of thumb, a FS for gluster has to support extended attributes, so, > this is a good way to start: check if you can tdo that. > > Also, when setting gluster with the recommended configuration, you are > supposed to use XFS, and the inodes have to be defined with -i size=512. > > If experimenting with other FS, make sure you can set the inode as well, > just to be in the safe side. > > EXT4 is not a good option right now, just in case you are wondering. > Lots of discussion and documentation on those issues in past threads of the > list. > > Cheers. > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Apostolos Manolitzas < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I just discovered the GlusterFS while looking for a solution for high >> availability on our NAND flashes. We use >> ubifs<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_file_system#Linux_flash_filesystems>and >> jffs2<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_file_system#Linux_flash_filesystems>for >> filesystem and we would like to apply some high availability strategy >> to a part of the flash. So has anyone tested GlusterFS with this setup? Is >> it a viable solution or should we move to an upper layer solution? >> >> thanks for any opinion, >> >> -Apostolos >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
