On 30/07/2014, at 6:06 PM, Juan José Pavlik Salles wrote:
> Thanks Justin, it really helps! I should set this up in about a month or two. 
> It's more or less what I was thinking, 3.3 is quiet old already, so I should 
> choose between 3.4.5 and 3.5.1. What would be a great reason not to pick 
> 3.5.1 (besides the bugs will arise eventually)? Is there any functional 
> difference between them? Regarding to the hardware I picked, have you ever 
> worked with this kind of hardware with gluster?

I'm not the right guy for answering hardware questions for production
Gluster, so other people would have to chime in there. ;)

For choosing between 3.4 and 3.5, it depends on the features you
need (eg are some only in 3.5?).  3.4 will be deprecated sooner than
3.5, but that shouldn't be a real blocker.  You'll be able to upgrade
from 3.4 to 3.5 whenever that happens, and it _should_ be pretty
smooth.

:)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to