On Sep 30, 2014 5:00 AM, "Justin Clift" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 25/09/2014, at 7:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote: > <snip> > > Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share their experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're planning to explore some of it's features and put it to use for GlusterFS. This was discussed briefly during the weekly meeting on #gluster-meeting[2]. > > > In last week's GlusterFS Community Meeting, I volunteered to get a > VM up and running in Rackspace so people could start getting btrfs > testing happening. > > The requested OS was Fedora 21 (alpha) as it has newer versions of > stuff than in Fedora 20. > > However, I'm having some real problems getting F21 up and running > in Rackspace. In a local VM on my desktop, no issue. In Rackspace > though, it never (ever) comes back from the reboot after the > upgrade. (suspecting due to the PVHVM nature of the VM maybe) > > How critical is it for this to be F21 instead of F20? If it's > really important, then I'll start getting really creative to get > F21 on there. But it's likely to be a bit of a time suck with > experimentation.
Not critical at all. F20 should suffice. > > Or would F20 (extremely easy to do) be good enough for now? Absolutely. Please go ahead with F20. > > Regards and best wishes, > > Justin Clift > > -- > GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org > > An open source, distributed file system scaling to several > petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. > > My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
