Rebuilding related packages looks to be a solution , however it may not be possible for each and every release builds of GlusterFS. lets discuss it in community meeting and act.
--Humble http://humblec.com On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 05:52:38PM +0100, Anders Blomdell wrote: > > On 2014-10-28 17:30, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:42:00AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > >> On 10/28/2014 07:48 AM, Darshan Narayana Murthy wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> Installation of glusterfs-3.6beta with vdsm > (vdsm-4.14.8.1-0.fc19.x86_64) fails on > > >>> f19 & f20 because of dependency issues with qemu packages. > > >>> > > >>> I installed vdsm-4.14.8.1-0.fc19.x86_64 which installs > glusterfs-3.5.2-1.fc19.x86_64 > > >>> as dependency. Now when I try to update glusterfs by downloading > rpms from : > > >>> > http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.6.0beta3/Fedora/fedora-19/ > > >>> It fails with following error: > > >>> > > >>> Error: Package: 2:qemu-system-lm32-1.4.2-15.fc19.x86_64 (@updates) > > >>> Requires: libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) > > >>> Removing: glusterfs-api-3.5.2-1.fc19.x86_64 (@updates) > > >>> libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) > > >>> Updated By: glusterfs-api-3.6.0-0.5.beta3.fc19.x86_64 > (/glusterfs-api-3.6.0-0.5.beta3.fc19.x86_64) > > >>> ~libgfapi.so.7()(64bit) > > >>> Available: glusterfs-api-3.4.0-0.5.beta2.fc19.x86_64 > (fedora) > > >>> libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) > > >>> > > >>> Full output at: http://ur1.ca/ikvk8 > > >>> > > >>> For having snapshot and geo-rep management through ovirt, we > need glusterfs-3.6 to be > > >>> installed with vdsm, which is currently failing. > > >>> > > >>> Can you please provide your suggestions to resolve this issue. > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Starting in 3.6 we have bumped the SO_VERSION of libgfapi. > > >> > > >> You need to install glusterfs-api-devel-3.6.0... first and build vdsm. > > >> > > >> But.... we are (or were) not planning to release glusterfs-3.6.0 on > f19 and > > >> f20... > > >> > > >> Off hand I don't believe there's anything in glusterfs-api-3.6.0 that > vdsm > > >> needs. vdsm with glusterfs-3.5.x on f19 and f20 should be okay. > > >> > > >> Is there something new in vdsm-4-14 that really needs glusterfs-3.6? > If so > > >> we can revisit whether we release 3.6 to fedora 19 and 20. > > > > > > The chain of dependencies is like this: > > > > > > vdsm -> qemu -> libgfapi.so.0 > > > > > > I think a rebuild of QEMU should be sufficient. I'm planning to put > > > glusterfs-3.6 and rebuilds of related packages in a Fedora COPR. This > > > would make it possible for Fedora users to move to 3.6 before they > > > switch to Fedora 22. > > AFAICT the only difference between libgfapi.so.0 and libgfapi.so.7 are > > two added synbols (glfs_get_volfile, glfs_h_access) and __THROW on > > functions. Wouldn't it be possible to provide a compatibilty > libgfapi.so.0 > > to ease migration? > > That is possible, sure. I think that rebuilding related packages is just > easier, there are only a few needed. Users that would like to run 3.6 > before it is made available with Fedora 22 need to add a repository for > the glusterfs-3.6 packages anyway, using the same repository to provide > related packages is simple enough. > > But, if there is a strong interest in having a -compat package, we can > discuss that during tomorrows (Wednesdays) meeting. > > Thanks, > Niels > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > gluster-de...@gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users