On 2015-02-26 22:24, Justin Clift wrote: > On 26 Feb 2015, at 18:39, Kingsley <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 23:27 +0200, aytac zeren wrote: >>> 3.6.2 is a major release and introduces some new features in cluster >>> wide concept. Additionally it is not stable yet. >> >> Hi, >> >> When will 3.6 be considered stable? I'm waiting to deploy a cluster into >> a production environment. I've built a 3.6.2 cluster and have put a live >> copy of the data onto it, which took rsync a solid 2 weeks to do. Isn't rsync about the worst to do in order to populate a gluster volume? Wouldn't it help to have multiple threads copying files in order not to have to wait for stat-calls to propagate back and forth between client and server(s)?
>> I don't really want to go through that again if I can help it. > > We thought it was - including getting tested by a some places fairly > intensively before - until bugs started showing up when people deployed > it to production. > > We're actively working on a 3.6.3 release, fixing the reported bugs, > and should have a beta out in the near-ish future. (3.6.3beta1 came > out on 11th Feb, we're still working on a few more patches) > > And yeah, not great. :/ Ah, so I'm not the only one that experienced problems, perhaps time to try to deploy gluster once more. Is ext4 still a problem, or is that particular issue fixed (entries occuring multiple times might indicate that it's not, but the true reason for that behaviour when I tested still eludes me [due to lacking understanding of the internals]). /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: [email protected] Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone: +46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
