I tried out Gluster 3.7.2 and it appears to work fine, after the geo-rep is
created, all of the existing files on the master volume appear to get
copied over to the slave. Is there a known bug in 3.6.3 that would prevent
this?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Gabriel Kuri <[email protected]> wrote:

> Running Gluster 3.6.3, I'm seeing odd (possibly buggy) behavior with the
> initial sync of the master -> slave on a new geo-rep volume. If I create
> the geo-rep volume and start it, all of the existing files in the master
> volume won't get synced over to the slave. Any new files that are created
> after the geo-rep is created are synced to the slave. Do I need to do
> anything to tell the master to sync existing files from the master -> slave
> after creating the geo-rep?
>
> Thanks ...
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to