Mathieu Chateau <[email protected]> writes: > I do have DFS-R in production, that replaced sometimes netapp ones. > But no similar workload as my current GFS. > > In active/active, the most common issue is file changed on both side (no > global lock) > Will users access same content from linux & windows ?
If you want to go active/active. I'd recommend Samba + CTDB + Gluster. You want true clustering, and a system that can handle the locking etc. I'd layer normal DFS to do "namespace" control, and to help with handling failover, or just use round robin DNS. Thanks, -Ira _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
