On 21 August 2015 at 23:46, Christian Rice <[email protected]> wrote:
> I’d like to have a distributed-replicated master volume, and > distributed-only slave. > > Can this be done? Just beginning the research, but so far I’ve only done > geo-replication with distributed-only volumes. Tips/caveats on this kind > architecture are welcome. > Yes, This can be done. Both master and slave can be of different configurations. But make sure that your slave volume has more effective size available than the master volume. HTH //MS > > The rationale is straightforward—the master volume should be able to stay > available with all data when suffering a node loss, but the geo-replicated > volumes can be taken offline for repairs and resync as soon as possible. > > Cheers, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
