Have you considered the disperse volume? We'd normally advocate 6 servers for a +2 redundancy factor though.
Paul C On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:47 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Gluster users, > > I am looking to implement GlusterFS on my network for large, expandable, > and redundant storage. > > I have 5 servers with 1 brick each. All I want is a simple replication > that requires at least 3 of the 5 bricks have a copy of the data so I can > lose any 2 bricks without data loss. I have tried replica 3 with 5 bricks > but it seems to complain that my # of bricks must be a multiple of of my > replica count. > > There a simple replication method like replica=3 with 5 bricks with > glusterfs? Is there a better or different technology I can use for this? > > Thanks, > Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
