On 1 October 2015 at 01:38, Tom Pepper <[email protected]> wrote: > If you can stomach a small recovery window, I'd instead suggest vanilla > NFS, snapshots, and zfs send/receive to keep a nearline replica. You'll > have much higher sequential I/O if so. >
You mean not use glusters/ceph at all? a pure zfs solution? I have considered a setup like that, it has its advantages and we could wear the recovery window. But it does require manual maintenance and switch over when a node goes down as opposed to the automation of gluster. But the performance is very good. > > LACP will also restrict single socket performance to 1Gbps, but multi > socket can exceed of course. > Its a PITA that when dealing with two/three nodes setups :( thanks. -- Lindsay
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
