On 10/13/2015 03:44 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
>>Good news is we already have a WIP patch review.glusterd.org/10851
> <http://review.glusterd.org/10851> to introduce multi threaded shd.
> Credits to Richard/Shreyas from facebook for this. IIRC, we also have a
> BZ for the same
>>
> Isnt it the same bugzilla
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221737) mentioned in the
> commit log? 
It is, just that I was too lazy to scroll down for the bug as topic
would have been also ideally be the same (bug-XXXXXXX)
> 
> --Humble
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Atin Mukherjee
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     -Atin
>     Sent from one plus one
>     On Oct 13, 2015 3:16 AM, "Ben Turner" <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>     >
>     > ----- Original Message -----
>     > > From: "Lindsay Mathieson" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     > > To: "gluster-users" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     > > Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 9:18:11 AM
>     > > Subject: [Gluster-users] Speed up heal performance
>     > >
>     > > Is there any way to max out heal performance? My cluster is unused 
> overnight,
>     > > and lightly used at lunchtimes, it would be handy to speed up a heal.
>     > >
>     > > The only tuneable I found was cluster.self-heal-window-size, which 
> doesn't
>     > > seem to make much difference.
>     >
>     > I don't know of any way to speed this up, maybe someone else could 
> chime in here that knows the heal daemon better than me.  Maybe you could 
> open an RFE on this?  In my testing I only see 2 files getting healed at a 
> time per replica pair.  I would like to see this be multi threaded(if its not 
> already) with the ability to tune it to control resource usage(similar to 
> what we did in the rebalance refactoring done recently).  If you let me know 
> the BZ # I'll add my data + suggestions, I have been testing this pretty 
> extensively in recent weeks and good data + some ideas on how to speed things 
> up.
>     Good news is we already have a WIP patch review.glusterd.org/10851
>     <http://review.glusterd.org/10851> to introduce multi threaded shd.
>     Credits to Richard/Shreyas from facebook for this. IIRC, we also
>     have a BZ for the same but the patch is in rfc as of now. AFAIK,
>     this is a candidate to land in 3.8 as well, Vijay can correct me
>     otherwise.
>     >
>     > -b
>     >
>     > > thanks,
>     > > --
>     > > Lindsay
>     > >
>     > > _______________________________________________
>     > > Gluster-users mailing list
>     > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Gluster-users mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gluster-users mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to