Hello Pranith, Thank you for prompt reaction. I didn't get back to this until now, because I had other problems to deal with.
Are there chances that it will get released this or next month? If not, I will probably have to resort to compiling on my own. Regards, Adrian 2015-10-26 12:37 GMT+01:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri <[email protected]>: > > > On 10/23/2015 10:10 AM, Ravishankar N wrote: > > > > On 10/21/2015 05:55 PM, Adrian Gruntkowski wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to track down a problem with my setup (version 3.7.3 on Debian > stable). > > I have a couple of volumes setup in 3-node configuration with 1 brick as > an arbiter for each. > > There are 4 volumes set up in cross-over across 3 physical servers, like > this: > > > > ------------------------------------->[ GigabitEthernet > switch ]<-------------------------- > | ^ > | > | | > | > V V > V > /-------------------------- \ > /-------------------------- \ /-------------------------- \ > | web-rep | | cluster-rep > | | mail-rep | > | | | > | | | > | vols: | | vols: > | | vols: | > | system_www1 | | system_www1 > | | system_www1(arbiter) | > | data_www1 | | data_www1 > | | data_www1(arbiter) | > | system_mail1(arbiter) | | system_mail1 > | | system_mail1 | > | data_mail1(arbiter) | | data_mail1 > | | data_mail1 | > \---------------------------/ > \---------------------------/ \---------------------------/ > > > Now, after a fresh boot-up, everything seems to be running fine. > Then I start copying big files (KVM disk images) from local disk to > gluster mounts. > In the beginning it seems to be running fine (although iowait seems go so > high that it clogs up io operations > at some moments, but that's an issue for later). After some time the > transfer freezes, then > after some (long) time, it advances in a short burst to freeze again. > Another interesting thing is that > I see constant flow of the network traffic on interfaces dedicated to > gluster, even when there's a "freeze". > > I have done "gluster volume statedump" at that time of transfer (file is > copied from local disk on cluster-rep > onto local mount of "system_www1" volume). I've observer a following > section in the dump for cluster-rep node: > > [xlator.features.locks.system_www1-locks.inode] > path=/images/101/vm-101-disk-1.qcow2 > mandatory=0 > inodelk-count=12 > lock-dump.domain.domain=system_www1-replicate-0:self-heal > inodelk.inodelk[0](ACTIVE)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = > 18446744073709551610, owner=c811600cd67f0000, client=0x7fbe100df280, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3603-2015/10/21-10:35:54:596929-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > granted at 2015-10-21 11:36:22 > lock-dump.domain.domain=system_www1-replicate-0 > inodelk.inodelk[0](ACTIVE)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=2195849216, > len=131072, pid = 18446744073709551610, owner=c811600cd67f0000, > client=0x7fbe100df280, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3603-2015/10/21-10:35:54:596929-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > granted at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[1](ACTIVE)=type=WRITE, whence=0, > start=9223372036854775805, len=1, pid = 18446744073709551610, > owner=c811600cd67f0000, client=0x7fbe100df280, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3603-2015/10/21-10:35:54:596929-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > granted at 2015-10-21 11:36:22 > > > From the statedump, It looks like self-heal daemon had taken locks to heal > the file due to which the locks attempted by the client (mount) are in > blocked state. > In Arbiter volumes the client (mount) takes full locks (start=0, len=0) > for every write() as opposed to normal replica volumes which take range > locks (i.e. appropriate start,len values) for that write(). This is done to > avoid network split-brains. > So in normal replica volumes, clients can still write to a file while heal > is going on, as long as the offsets don't overlap. This is not the case > with arbiter volumes. > You can look at the client or glustershd logs to see if there are messages > that indicate healing of a file, something along the lines of "Completed > data selfheal on xxx" > > hi Adrian, > Thanks for taking the time to send this mail. I raised this as bug @ > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275247, fix is posted for > review @ http://review.gluster.com/#/c/12426/ > > Pranith > > > inodelk.inodelk[2](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = 0, > owner=c4fd2d78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[3](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = 0, > owner=dc752e78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[4](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = 0, > owner=34832e78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[5](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = 0, > owner=d44d2e78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[6](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = 0, > owner=306f2e78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[7](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = 0, > owner=8c902e78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[8](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = 0, > owner=782c2e78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[9](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = 0, > owner=1c0b2e78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > inodelk.inodelk[10](BLOCKED)=type=WRITE, whence=0, start=0, len=0, pid = > 0, owner=24332e78487f0000, client=0x7fbe100e1380, > connection-id=cluster-vm-3846-2015/10/21-10:36:03:123909-system_www1-client-0-0-0, > blocked at 2015-10-21 11:37:45 > > There seem to be multiple locks in BLOCKED state - which doesn't look > normal to me. The other 2 nodes have > only 2 ACTIVE locks at the same time. > > Below is "gluster volume info" output. > > # gluster volume info > > Volume Name: data_mail1 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: fc3259a1-ddcf-46e9-ae77-299aaad93b7c > Status: Started > Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: cluster-rep:/GFS/data/mail1 > Brick2: mail-rep:/GFS/data/mail1 > Brick3: web-rep:/GFS/data/mail1 > Options Reconfigured: > performance.readdir-ahead: on > cluster.quorum-count: 2 > cluster.quorum-type: fixed > cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 51% > > Volume Name: data_www1 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: 0c37a337-dbe5-4e75-8010-94e068c02026 > Status: Started > Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: cluster-rep:/GFS/data/www1 > Brick2: web-rep:/GFS/data/www1 > Brick3: mail-rep:/GFS/data/www1 > Options Reconfigured: > performance.readdir-ahead: on > cluster.quorum-type: fixed > cluster.quorum-count: 2 > cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 51% > > Volume Name: system_mail1 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: 0568d985-9fa7-40a7-bead-298310622cb5 > Status: Started > Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: cluster-rep:/GFS/system/mail1 > Brick2: mail-rep:/GFS/system/mail1 > Brick3: web-rep:/GFS/system/mail1 > Options Reconfigured: > performance.readdir-ahead: on > cluster.quorum-type: none > cluster.quorum-count: 2 > cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 51% > > Volume Name: system_www1 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: 147636a2-5c15-4d9a-93c8-44d51252b124 > Status: Started > Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: cluster-rep:/GFS/system/www1 > Brick2: web-rep:/GFS/system/www1 > Brick3: mail-rep:/GFS/system/www1 > Options Reconfigured: > performance.readdir-ahead: on > cluster.quorum-type: none > cluster.quorum-count: 2 > cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 51% > > The issue does not occur when I get rid of 3rd arbiter brick. > > > What do you mean by 'getting rid of'? Killing the 3rd brick process of the > volume? > > Regards, > Ravi > > > If there's any additional information that is missing and I could provide, > please let me know. > > Greetings, > Adrian > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing > [email protected]http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing > [email protected]http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
