On 6 November 2015 at 17:22, Krutika Dhananjay <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure. So far I've just been able to figure that GlusterFS counts blocks in > multiples of 512B while XFS seems to count them in multiples of 4.0KB. > Let me again try creating sparse files on xfs, sharded and non-sharded > gluster volumes and compare the results. I'll let you know what I find. > I repeated the tests with a single gluster brick on a ext4 partition - disk usage (du) and file size were exactly right. -- Lindsay
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
