Le 03/03/2016 13:18, Krutika Dhananjay a écrit :
What does "nearest" storage server mean? Are the clients residing in the storage pool too? Or are they external to the cluster?

They are external.
Nearest means that they are in the same building, linked by the same switch. Machines in the other building are rooted via some more equipments.

--
Y.
-Krutika
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From: *"Yannick Perret" <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr>
    *To: *gluster-users@gluster.org
    *Sent: *Thursday, March 3, 2016 5:38:33 PM
    *Subject: *[Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

    Hello,

    I can't find if it is possible to set a prefered server on a
    per-client
    basis for replica volumes, so I ask the question here.

    The context: we have 2 storage servers, each in one building. We also
    have several virtual machines on each building, and they can migrate
    from one building to an other (depending on load, maintenance…).

    So (for testing at this time) I setup a x2 replica volume, one
    replica
    on each storage server of course. As most of our volumes are "many
    reads
    - few writes" it would be better for bandwidth that each client
    uses the
    "nearest" storage server (local building switch) - for reading, of
    course. The 2 buildings have a good netlink but we prefer to
    minimize -
    when not needed - data transferts beetween them (this link is shared).

    Can you see a solution for this kind of tuning? As far as I
    understand
    geo-replica is not really what I need, no?

    It exists "cluster.read-subvolume" option of course but we can have
    clients on both building so a per-volume option is not what we
    need. An
    per-client equivalent of this option should be nice.

    I tested by myself a small patch to perform this - and it seems to
    work
    fine as far as I can see - but 1. before continuing in this way I
    would
    first check if it exists an other way and 2. I'm not familiar with
    the
    whole code so I'm not sure that my tests are in the
    "state-of-the-art"
    for glusterfs.

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Regards,
    --
    Y.



    _______________________________________________
    Gluster-users mailing list
    Gluster-users@gluster.org
    http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to