On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 23:47:05 Russell Purinton wrote: > The routing table looks normal. That 3rd statement that Pawan mentioned is > just a normal default gateway. Nothing wrong there. > > I suspect the issue is at the virtual network layer… <forward > mode='route’/> seems suspect. > > http://serverfault.com/questions/270931/routing-networking-on-kvm > <http://serverfault.com/questions/270931/routing-networking-on-kvm> > > I think you’d want to setup Bridge mode interfaces.
Yeah, I think it is something in the network layer. However, it worked fine when the KVM config was using NAT. A bridged interface requires linking up with a physical interface on the host machine, and I can't do that on the machine I'm on at the moment. Really not sure what's going on here. I wish there was a way for two 'nat' type virbr networks to talk to each other, I wouldn't need the 'route' type. j -- Joshua J. Kugler - Fairbanks, Alaska Azariah Enterprises - Programming and Website Design [email protected] - Jabber: [email protected] PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ID 0x73B13B6A _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
