3.8.0 has a bug that prevents certain operations with libgfapi which will affect the self-heal daemon, nfs, and any applications built to use the api.

I would wait for 3.8.1. I'm not sure if a fix will be in 3.7.12, it's broken in 3.7.12rc2.


On 06/23/2016 02:33 PM, WK wrote:
<BUMP>

I am curious as well.

We are still planning an upgrade off our old 3.4 clusters which work perfectly fine <grin>, though they lack the sharding and thus are subject to the 'freeze while resync VM' problem when cluster members are upgraded/break.

Thus we need to to know if we should be using the upcoming 3.7.12 release or go straight to the upcoming 3.8.x branch (and avoid a rip and replace upgrade later on).

-wk


On 6/22/2016 4:18 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
Hey all, have been away for two weeks and I see there has been a 3.8 release with some fascinating new features and a slew of fixes.


Unfortunately I'm not in a good position to pre-test before rollout now, we've moved all our VM's to 3.7.11 where it is working very nicely.


Is 3.8.0 considered stable for production? would I be safe to update to it and keep my current datastore on 3.7.11 features, but start a test datastore for 3.8 on the same nodes? Impossible to answer? :)



_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to