13.07.2016 09:19, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Dmitry Melekhov <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
13.07.2016 09:09, Lindsay Mathieson пишет:
On 13 July 2016 at 15:06, Dmitry Melekhov <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
zfs repairs deleted files? wow! :-D
File corruptions (if you have zfs raid configured), which I
presumed
you were referring to.
There is only so much a system can do to protect users against
themselves, If you insist on deleting underlying files on a
brick and
not triggering a full heal then I suggest you have crossed
that line.
There are two types of corruption:
1. hardware failure, to prevent this we use hardware raid6 right
now, this is quite good, imho;
2. human errors, this is what I'm talking about here.
I think classic solution for human errors is snapshots. Which is
present in gluster. Feel free to give us feedback.
ooh :-(
If gluster heals files on access why it does not heal them during
self-heal process? Is this really self-heal?
And snapshots are on different level- they save gluster volume at whole,
not from bricks difference....
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
