Il 13 lug 2016 07:16, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > This is a corner case, from design perspective it is generally not a good idea to optimize for the corner case. It is better to protect ourselves from the corner case (SElinux etc) or you can also use snapshots to protect against these kind of mishaps.
Non only a corner case. What if fsck delete a file due to a missing inode or similiar corruption? This happened to me more than once before (not with gluster) XFS was famous to set length to 0 to some corrupted files, years ago. this doesn't trigger any self healing Anyway, what would happen trying to access (through gluster) to a file that has zero lenght on one node and proper size the other replicas? Will this trigger healing for that file?
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
