Adding Jiffin, Kaushal to the thread On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:38 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > ------------------------------ > [email protected] > > > *发件人：* [email protected] > *发送时间：* 2016-08-19 19:07 > *收件人：* ndevos <[email protected]>; gluster-devel > <[email protected]> > *抄送：* gluster-devel <[email protected]> > *主题：* 转发: 转发: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362 > > > ------------------------------ > [email protected] > > > *发件人：* [email protected] > *发送时间：* 2016-08-17 16:05 > *收件人：* > *抄送：* gluster-devel <[email protected]> > *主题：* 转发: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362 > > > *发件人：* [email protected] > *发送时间：* 2016-08-17 14:33 > *收件人：* thottanjiffin <[email protected]>; kshlmster > <[email protected]> > *抄送：* javen.wu <[email protected]>; peng.hse <[email protected]> > *主题：* glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362 > hello: > > Thanks thotz and kshlm for your fix of the problem glusterfs > bug1343362 > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/ > c04ee47d1e9847b50c459734a42681450005ee60 > > > I am aware that you splited the two variables to store the > argument of setattr and the lookup returned attr. I was thinking > increasing the size of > call_state_t structure only for the problem might consume more > memory for all irrelevant operations. I am trying another method and > looking forward to your advise. > You can visit it here https://github.com/YanyunGao/ > glusterfs/commit/f4e248ce2fd4cea74c19d7c9bc9a3fcd7f8edaca > > > How do you think? > > > Thanks > ------------------------------ > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
