Hi,

I have noticed that when using a distribute volume, if a brick is not 
accessible, volume is still accessible in read-write mode, but some files can't 
be created (depending on filename).
Is it possible to force a distribute volume to be put in read-only mode during 
a brick failure, to avoid random access error?
I'm afraid of application behavior in this case, when only some files are not 
accessible. I prefer to have volume not writeable when a brick failed.

Thanks.

Regards,
Lionel BEARD

________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pi?ces jointes (ci-apr?s le "message") sont ?tablis ? 
l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous 
recevez ce message par erreur ou s'il ne vous est pas destin?, merci de le 
d?truire ainsi que toute copie de votre syst?me et d'en avertir imm?diatement 
l'exp?diteur. Toute lecture non autoris?e, toute utilisation de ce message qui 
n'est pas conforme ? sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, 
totale ou partielle, est interdite. L'Internet ne permettant pas d'assurer 
l'int?grit? de ce message ?lectronique susceptible d'alt?ration, l'exp?diteur 
(et ses filiales) d?cline(nt) toute responsabilit? au titre de ce message dans 
l'hypoth?se o? il aurait ?t? modifi? ou falsifi?.

This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s) and is confidential. If you receive this message in 
error, or are not the intended recipient(s), please delete it and any copies 
from your systems and immediately notify the sender. Any unauthorized view, use 
that does not comply with its purpose, dissemination or disclosure, either 
whole or partial, is prohibited. Since the internet cannot guarantee the 
integrity of this message which may not be reliable, the sender (and its 
subsidiaries) shall not be liable for the message if modified or falsified.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to