It's a good point, thanks. I can potentially throw a lot of hardware at it, so any measures taken against possible split brains are worthy of doing.
I'm now trying to understand what a reasonable number of nodes a gluster cluster can have (without major head aches with re-balancing etc.), what people's experience about it etc. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 7:54 PM, David Gossage <[email protected]> wrote: > > First thing I notice is that without 3 nodes for quorum you run risk of > split brain issues. A 3rd node for 3 way replication, or an arbiter node > would help with that. I like 3 nodes replication, but that also has effect > on network throughput as you are now copying data once more simultaneously. _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
