Hi, you can install 3.8.7 from centos-gluster38-test using:

yum --enablerepo=centos-gluster38-test install glusterfs

I am not sure how QA works for CentOS Storage SIG, but 3.8.7 works same as
3.8.5 for me - libvirt gfapi is unfortunately broken, no other problems
detected.

Btw 3.9 is short term maintenance release (
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-September/015197.html).


-ps

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Daryl lee <daryl...@ece.ucsb.edu> wrote:

> Hey Gluster Community,
>
> According to the community packages list I get the impression that 3.8
> would be released to the CentOS Storage SIG Repo, but this seems to have
> stopped with 3.8.5 and 3.9 is still missing all together.   However, 3.7 is
> still being updated and is at 3.7.8 so I am confused why the other two
> versions have stopped.
>
>
>
> I did some looking on the past posts to this list and found a conversation
> about 3.9 on the CentOS repo last year but it looks like it's still not up
> yet; possibly due to a lack of community involvement in the testing and
> reporting back to whoever the maintainer is (which we don’t know yet)?   I
> might be in a position to help since I have a test environment that mirrors
> my production environment setup that I would use for testing the patch
> anyways, I might as well provide some good to the community..   At this
> point I know to do " yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster38-test
> glusterfs-server" but I'm not sure who to tell if it works or not, and what
> kind of info they are looking for.    If someone wanted to give me a little
> guidance that would be awesome, especially if it will save me from having
> to switch to manually downloading packages.
>
>
>
> I guess the basic question is do we expect releases to resume for 3.8 on
> the CentOS Storage SIG repo or should I be looking to move to manual
> patching for 3.8.  Additionally, if the person who does the releases to the
> CentOS Storage SIG is waiting for someone to tell them it looks fine,  who
> should I contact to do so?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Daryl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to