> On 24 Jan 2017, at 13:48, Lindsay Mathieson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 24/01/2017 10:23 PM, Alessandro Briosi wrote: >> Ok so having 2 bonds 1 attached to each switch would work. Though I still >> cannot get how to make gluster use both links (or at least one with >> active/passive). >> Should I work on RRDNS and keepalived? Or use some bonding of a bond within >> the 2 switches with balance-rr in this case? >> How do other implement this? > > I *think* you can have the 4 nics on the one bond on a node with two through > one switch, two through the other. Might be worth asking on the proxmox list > as well. > > That way just one interface for gluster to use. I don't think it would work > with LACP though.
It would work with traditional LACP if both switches are manageable and in the same stack. If switches are dumbs (ie only L2 or not stackable), I think there is a Linux bonding mode that can do the work, but well I would stay away from such configuration that seems to me a bit hazardous. Cheers — Cédric Lemarchand > > -- > > Lindsay Mathieson > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
