[+gluster-users] On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > a few weeks ago I opened a survey asking oVirt users about how they use > oVirt. > Here are the analytics of the survey: > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1s3k4pq_U4vHTuUUKr6dOosGj_ > EGFxqEisansHlqnyyM/viewanalytics#responses > > Most notable facts: > - 197 responses, two times the responses we got with the 3.6 survey! > - CentOS confims as the most used distribution for running oVirt engine > (89.8%) and Hypervisors (74.3% which become 94.2% including oVirt Node > which is a CentOS spin) > - Fedora is the second distribution (4.6%) mostly used only for runnig > oVirt engine > - oVirt Node jumped from 7.1% on 3.6 survey to 19.9% in 4.1! > - Surprisingly we have someone running both engine and hypervisor on > Ubuntu based system, within VMs. I'd like to hear more about this use case. > - Within other OS we had Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7 and Scientific > Linux (I guess 7, wasn't specified) > - Within the storage, there isn't a "winner" between NFS, Gluster and > iSCSI. Within Other Storage, Fiber Channel is the most used. We had also: > Ceph, DAS, EMC ScaleIO, GPFS > - Hosted Engine is the most used deployment choice with 58.4% (was 50.0% > in 3.6) > - 65.8% of Hosted Engine users use it in Hyperconverged setup. > > Thank you for your feedback and appreciation, we'll look into suggestions > you sent in the survey. > > -- > > SANDRO BONAZZOLA > > ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > <https://red.ht/sig> > TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
