Hi Amar, Currently, we are running 40 node cluster and each node has 36*6TB(210TB).As of now we don't face any issue with read and write performance except folder listing and disk failure healing. Planning to start another cluster with 36*10TB(360)per node. What kind of problem will we face if we go with 36*10(360)per node. Planned 360TB per node is far from recommended 64TB. We are using Glusterfs with disperse volume for video archival.
Regards K. Mohamed Pakkeer On 20-Apr-2017 9:00 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 at 11:07 PM, Peter B. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Could you tell me what the technically maximum limit of capacity of a >> GlusterFS storage is? >> I cannot find any official statement on this... >> >> Somewhere it says "several Petabytes", but that's a bit vague. > > > It is mostly vague because the total storage depends on 2 things, what is > per node storage you can get, and then how many nodes you have in cluster? > > It is scalable comfortably for 128nodes, and per node you can have 64TB > drives, making it 8PB. > > > >> I'd need it for arguing pro GlusterFS in comparison to other systems. > > > Hope the above info helps you. Btw, we are targeting more scalability > related improvements in Gluster 4.0, so it should be much larger number > from next year. > > -Amar > > > >> >> Thank you very much in advance, >> Peter B. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts) > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
