We are using 3.10 and have a 7 PB cluster.  We decided against 16+3 as the
rebuild time are bottlenecked by matrix operations which scale as the
square of the number of data stripes.  There are some savings because of
larger data chunks but we ended up using 8+3 and heal times are about half
compared to 16+3.

-Alastair

On 30 June 2017 at 02:22, Serkan Çoban <[email protected]> wrote:

> >Thanks for the reply. We will mainly use this for archival - near-cold
> storage.
> Archival usage is good for EC
>
> >Anything, from your experience, to keep in mind while planning large
> installations?
> I am using 3.7.11 and only problem is slow rebuild time when a disk
> fails. It takes 8 days to heal a 8TB disk.(This might be related with
> my EC configuration 16+4)
> 3.9+ versions has some improvements about this but I cannot test them
> yet...
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:49 PM, jkiebzak <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply. We will mainly use this for archival - near-cold
> > storage.
> >
> >
> > Anything, from your experience, to keep in mind while planning large
> > installations?
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Serkan Çoban <[email protected]>
> > Date: 6/29/17 4:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Jason Kiebzak <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Gluster Users <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Multi petabyte gluster
> >
> > I am currently using 10PB single volume without problems. 40PB is on
> > the way. EC is working fine.
> > You need to plan ahead with large installations like this. Do complete
> > workload tests and make sure your use case is suitable for EC.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Jason Kiebzak <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Has anyone scaled to a multi petabyte gluster setup? How well does
> erasure
> >> code do with such a large setup?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gluster-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to