On 4 October 2017 at 23:34, WK <[email protected]> wrote: > Just so I know. > > Is it correct to assume that this corruption issue is ONLY involved if you > are doing rebalancing with sharding enabled. > > So if I am not doing rebalancing I should be fine? >
That is correct. > -bill > > > > On 10/3/2017 10:30 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Nithya Balachandran <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On 3 October 2017 at 13:27, Gandalf Corvotempesta < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Any update about multiple bugs regarding data corruptions with >>> sharding enabled ? >>> >>> Is 3.12.1 ready to be used in production? >>> >> >> Most issues have been fixed but there appears to be one more race for >> which the patch is being worked on. >> >> @Krutika, is that correct? >> >> >> > That is my understanding too, yes, in light of the discussion that > happened at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465123 > > -Krutika > > >> Thanks, >> Nithya >> >> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing > [email protected]http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
