Last time I've read about tiering in gluster, there wasn't any performance gain with VM workload and more over doesn't speed up writes...
Il 10 ott 2017 9:27 PM, "Bartosz Zięba" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Hi, > > Have you thought about using an SSD as a GlusterFS hot tiers? > > Regards, > Bartosz > > > On 10.10.2017 19:59, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > >> 2017-10-10 18:27 GMT+02:00 Jeff Darcy <[email protected]>: >> >>> Probably not. If there is, it would probably favor XFS. The developers >>> at Red Hat use XFS almost exclusively. We at Facebook have a mix, but >>> XFS is (I think) the most common. Whatever the developers use tends to >>> become "the way local filesystems work" and code is written based on >>> that profile, so even without intention that tends to get a bit of a >>> boost. To the extent that ZFS makes different tradeoffs - e.g. using >>> lots more memory, very different disk access patterns - it's probably >>> going to have a bit more of an "impedance mismatch" with the choices >>> Gluster itself has made. >>> >> Ok, so XFS is the way to go :) >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
