We noticed something similar.

Out of interest, does du -sh . show the same size?

--
Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC)
https://smcleod.net
https://twitter.com/s_mcleod

Words are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer 
or partners.

> On 31 Jan 2018, at 12:47 pm, Freer, Eva B. <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> After OS update to CentOS 7.4 or RedHat 6.9 and update to Gluster 3.12.4, the 
> ‘df’ command shows only part of the available space on the mount point for 
> multi-brick volumes. All nodes are at 3.12.4. This occurs on both servers and 
> clients. 
>  
> We have 2 different server configurations.
>  
> Configuration 1: A distributed volume of 8 bricks with 4 on each server. The 
> initial configuration had 4 bricks of 59TB each with 2 on each server. Prior 
> to the update to CentOS 7.4 and gluster 3.12.4, ‘df’ correctly showed the 
> size for the volume as 233TB. After the update, we added 2 bricks with 1 on 
> each server, but the output of ‘df’ still only listed 233TB for the volume. 
> We added 2 more bricks, again with 1 on each server. The output of ‘df’ now 
> shows 350TB, but the aggregate of 8 – 59TB bricks should be ~466TB.
>  
> Configuration 2: A distributed, replicated volume with 9 bricks on each 
> server for a total of ~350TB of storage. After the server update to RHEL 6.9 
> and gluster 3.12.4, the volume now shows as having 50TB with ‘df’. No changes 
> were made to this volume after the update.
>  
> In both cases, examining the bricks shows that the space and files are still 
> there, just not reported correctly with ‘df’. All machines have been rebooted 
> and the problem persists.
>  
> Any help/advice you can give on this would be greatly appreciated.
>  
> Thanks in advance.
> Eva Freer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users 
> <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to