> On Sep 21, 2018, at 05:18, Anoop C S <[email protected]> wrote: > > Base on your explanation I would repeat my previous request to remove [IPC$] > and follow what I > suggested above on moving "vfs objects" to individual shares.
Ok, I’ve now rearranged my smb.conf files on our test system to prevent the IPC$ issue, and I’ve removed the IPC$ stanza. testparm -s no longer warns about IPC$ stuff, but it still complains about idmap range. There’s no difference in behaviour regarding vfs_gluster issue. > Isn't shares [share1] and [module] same? It is. I created new shares of the same directory, with obvious names, to explore different configs as I diagnosed the issue. Terry
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
