On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 9:59 PM Dmitry Isakbayev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Still no JVM crushes. Is it possible that running glusterfs with > performance options turned off for a couple of days cleared out the "stale > metadata issue"? > restarting these options, would've cleared the existing cache and hence previous stale metadata would've been cleared. Hitting stale metadata again depends on races. That might be the reason you are still not seeing the issue. Can you try with enabling all perf xlators (default configuration)? > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 1:38 PM Dmitry Isakbayev <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The software ran with all of the options turned off over the weekend >> without any problems. >> I will try to collect the debug info for you. I have re-enabled the 3 >> three options, but yet to see the problem reoccurring. >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 6:46 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Dmitry. Can you provide the following debug info I asked earlier: >>> >>> * strace -ff -v ... of java application >>> * dump of the I/O traffic seen by the mountpoint (use --dump-fuse while >>> mounting). >>> >>> regards, >>> Raghavendra >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 2:08 AM Dmitry Isakbayev <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> These 3 options seem to trigger both (reading zip file and renaming >>>> files) problems. >>>> >>>> Options Reconfigured: >>>> performance.io-cache: off >>>> performance.stat-prefetch: off >>>> performance.quick-read: off >>>> performance.parallel-readdir: off >>>> *performance.readdir-ahead: on* >>>> *performance.write-behind: on* >>>> *performance.read-ahead: on* >>>> performance.client-io-threads: off >>>> nfs.disable: on >>>> transport.address-family: inet >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 10:24 AM Dmitry Isakbayev <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Turning a single option on at a time still worked fine. I will keep >>>>> trying. >>>>> >>>>> We had used 4.1.5 on KVM/CentOS7.5 at AWS without these issues or log >>>>> messages. Do you suppose these issues are triggered by the new >>>>> environment >>>>> or did not exist in 4.1.5? >>>>> >>>>> [root@node1 ~]# glusterfs --version >>>>> glusterfs 4.1.5 >>>>> >>>>> On AWS using >>>>> [root@node1 ~]# hostnamectl >>>>> Static hostname: node1 >>>>> Icon name: computer-vm >>>>> Chassis: vm >>>>> Machine ID: b30d0f2110ac3807b210c19ede3ce88f >>>>> Boot ID: 52bb159a0aa94043a40e7c7651967bd9 >>>>> Virtualization: kvm >>>>> Operating System: CentOS Linux 7 (Core) >>>>> CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:centos:centos:7 >>>>> Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64 >>>>> Architecture: x86-64 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 8:56 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 7:23 PM Dmitry Isakbayev <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok. I will try different options. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This system is scheduled to go into production soon. What version >>>>>>> would you recommend to roll back to? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> These are long standing issues. So, rolling back may not make these >>>>>> issues go away. Instead if you think performance is agreeable to you, >>>>>> please keep these xlators off in production. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 3:13 AM Dmitry Isakbayev <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Raghavendra, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank for the suggestion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am suing >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [root@jl-fanexoss1p glusterfs]# gluster --version >>>>>>>>> glusterfs 5.0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On >>>>>>>>> [root@jl-fanexoss1p glusterfs]# hostnamectl >>>>>>>>> Icon name: computer-vm >>>>>>>>> Chassis: vm >>>>>>>>> Machine ID: e44b8478ef7a467d98363614f4e50535 >>>>>>>>> Boot ID: eed98992fdda4c88bdd459a89101766b >>>>>>>>> Virtualization: vmware >>>>>>>>> Operating System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.5 (Maipo) >>>>>>>>> CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7.5:GA:server >>>>>>>>> Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64 >>>>>>>>> Architecture: x86-64 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have configured the following options >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [root@jl-fanexoss1p glusterfs]# gluster volume info >>>>>>>>> Volume Name: gv0 >>>>>>>>> Type: Replicate >>>>>>>>> Volume ID: 5ffbda09-c5e2-4abc-b89e-79b5d8a40824 >>>>>>>>> Status: Started >>>>>>>>> Snapshot Count: 0 >>>>>>>>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 >>>>>>>>> Transport-type: tcp >>>>>>>>> Bricks: >>>>>>>>> Brick1: jl-fanexoss1p.cspire.net:/data/brick1/gv0 >>>>>>>>> Brick2: sl-fanexoss2p.cspire.net:/data/brick1/gv0 >>>>>>>>> Brick3: nxquorum1p.cspire.net:/data/brick1/gv0 >>>>>>>>> Options Reconfigured: >>>>>>>>> performance.io-cache: off >>>>>>>>> performance.stat-prefetch: off >>>>>>>>> performance.quick-read: off >>>>>>>>> performance.parallel-readdir: off >>>>>>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: off >>>>>>>>> performance.write-behind: off >>>>>>>>> performance.read-ahead: off >>>>>>>>> performance.client-io-threads: off >>>>>>>>> nfs.disable: on >>>>>>>>> transport.address-family: inet >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't know if it is related, but I am seeing a lot of >>>>>>>>> [2018-12-27 20:19:23.776080] W [MSGID: 114031] >>>>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops_v2.c:1932:client4_0_seek_cbk] 2-gv0-client-0: remote >>>>>>>>> operation failed [No such device or address] >>>>>>>>> [2018-12-27 20:19:47.735190] E [MSGID: 101191] >>>>>>>>> [event-epoll.c:671:event_dispatch_epoll_worker] 2-epoll: Failed to >>>>>>>>> dispatch >>>>>>>>> handler >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These msgs were introduced by patch [1]. To the best of my >>>>>>>> knowledge they are benign. We'll be sending a patch to fix these msgs >>>>>>>> though. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +Mohit Agrawal <[email protected]> +Milind Changire >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> . Can you try to identify why we are seeing >>>>>>>> these messages? If possible please send a patch to fix this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>> https://review.gluster.org/r/I578c3fc67713f4234bd3abbec5d3fbba19059ea5 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And java.io exceptions trying to rename files. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When you see the errors is it possible to collect, >>>>>>>> * strace of the java application (strace -ff -v ...) >>>>>>>> * fuse-dump of the glusterfs mount (use option --dump-fuse while >>>>>>>> mounting)? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also need another favour from you. By trail and error, can you >>>>>>>> point out which of the many performance xlators you've turned off is >>>>>>>> causing the issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The above two data-points will help us to fix the problem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank You, >>>>>>>>> Dmitry >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 3:48 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What version of glusterfs are you using? It might be either >>>>>>>>>> * a stale metadata issue. >>>>>>>>>> * inconsistent ctime issue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can you try turning off all performance xlators? If the issue is >>>>>>>>>> 1, that should help. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 1:51 AM Dmitry Isakbayev < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Attempted to set 'performance.read-ahead off` according to >>>>>>>>>>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7041 >>>>>>>>>>> That did not help. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 2:11 PM Dmitry Isakbayev < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The core file generated by JVM suggests that it happens because >>>>>>>>>>>> the file is changing while it is being read - >>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8186557. >>>>>>>>>>>> The application reads in the zipfile and goes through the zip >>>>>>>>>>>> entries, then reloads the file and goes the zip entries again. It >>>>>>>>>>>> does so >>>>>>>>>>>> 3 times. The application never crushes on the 1st cycle but >>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes >>>>>>>>>>>> crushes on the 2nd or 3rd cycle. >>>>>>>>>>>> The zip file is generated about 20 seconds prior to it being >>>>>>>>>>>> used and is not updated or even used by any other application. I >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> never seen this problem on a plain file system. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate any suggestions on how to go debugging this >>>>>>>>>>>> issue. I can change the source code of the java application. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitry >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
