thank you for your answer. I don't like the document of the project.In fact,many open source projects do not having a good document system. For exmaple,the version of doc does not match with the feature and some topic in the doc is outdated.
At this point,commercial software does more better. sz_cui...@163.com 发件人： Strahil Nikolov 发送时间： 2020-04-02 12:27 收件人： gluster-users; sz_cui...@163.com 主题： Re: [Gluster-users] not support so called “structured data” On April 2, 2020 5:24:39 AM GMT+03:00, "sz_cui...@163.com" <sz_cui...@163.com> wrote: >Document point out: >Gluster does not support so called “structured data”, meaning live, SQL >databases. Of course, using Gluster to backup and restore the database >would be fine. > >What? Not,support! >I had a test to run Oracle database on KVM/Ovirt/Gluster,it works >well,in fact. > >But why docs says not support ? It measn not suggest or not to use ? > > > > > >sz_cui...@163.com I don't know why this is written , but when I checked this doc: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.1/html/console_installation_guide/add_database_server_to_rhgs-c it seems pretty legid workload (no matter postgres, mysql, mariadb, oracle,hana,etc) . The only thing that comes to my mind is that usually DBs are quite valuable and thus a 'replica 3' volume or a 'replica 3 arbiter 1' volume should be used and a different set of options are needed (compared to other workloads). Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov
________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
