On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:47 AM Diego Zuccato <diego.zucc...@unibo.it> wrote:
> Il 10/10/20 16:53, Alex K ha scritto: > > > Reading from the docs i see that this is not recommended? > IIUC the risk of having partially-unsynced data is is too high. > DB replication is not easy to configure because it's hard to do well, > even active/passive. > But I can tell you that a 3-node mariadb (galera) cluster is not hard to > setup. Just follow one of the tutorials. It's nearly as easy as setting > up a replica3 gluster volume :) > And "guarantees" consinstency in the DB data. > I see. Since I will not have only mariadb, then I have to setup the same replication for postgresql and later influxdb, which adds into the complexity. For cluster management I will be using pacemaker/corosync. Thanx for your feedback > -- > Diego Zuccato > DIFA - Dip. di Fisica e Astronomia > Servizi Informatici > Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna > V.le Berti-Pichat 6/2 - 40127 Bologna - Italy > tel.: +39 051 20 95786 >
________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
