Thanks for this suggestion. It would work if archiving could only be applied to labeled messages, so those would not appear in the root of the inbox. Is that possible? That assumes that labeled messages still appear in subfolders after being archived - so that the hidden archive only hides messages in the inbox. Would it work this way?
Regarding deleted messages, there is a strange message that appears after a post. Right after I enter N posts and wait, "N message(s) deleted" appears. This remains for several hours and so I concluded that it meant what it said. If this message is the result of the message being held for approval, the wording should really be changed. No? On Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:09:42 PM UTC-6, justkenneth wrote: > > If you want to remove emails from your Inbox after you've labeled them, > just archive them. Archive removes them from the Inbox view. They're not > deleted and they will still have the labels you applied to them. > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Nick Mirro <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> I guess the answer is that I just kissed my inbox goodbye, that is unless >> there is a way to have the root inbox "show unlabeled only." Seeing every >> email that has arrived in one list is a tremendous downgrade. Not being >> able to see a brief list of what hasn't been processed is actually a >> problem for me. Thought gmail was powerful. It's my opinion that you >> might be overplaying the idea of the label. It is not a new concept and is >> not especially versatile for email use. Its simplicity does not seem to >> impart any unique benefit, other than maybe saving server space. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gmail-Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gmail-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
