Ok, that sounds good to me. I would appreciate the help, but can you  
wait a few days? I'd like to put out a newer 3.1 compatible version  
and I actually have some time to work on it now. Once that is done I  
can help you if you have questions. The code is fairly messy though...

On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Chris wrote:

> John, I think I'd like to help.  I need to learn how to work with  
> Firefox extensions anyway; the documentation seems to ramble on  
> about everything except how to connect all the bits.  I've actually  
> been planning to offer my help for some time, but this seems like an  
> appropriate occasion.
>
> I should note that I don't intend to stay on for more than a few  
> months, because that seems to be the maximum for how long each of my  
> hobbies can last.  But maybe I can at least fix a few of the more  
> important bugs.
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:58 PM, John Marshall <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>
> Most of it is, but I have a break now so I'll be fixing some problems
> and updating GMarks shortly. I don't have time to work on GMarks
> during school. The spam you're talking about only happened the last
> couple days. I can't always check it constantly.
>
> On Dec 13, 2008, at 5:44 PM, ekbworldwide wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm getting a great add-on for a great price: free. But your last  
> post
> > on Version 0.9.10b4 was on July 24th.
> >
> > My Gmarks sidebar shows about 20,000 - and things have started to  
> get
> > buggy. Well, they were a bit buggy months ago - now things are  
> getting
> > to the point I wonder if I have to look for an alternative  
> bookmarking
> > tool.
> >
> > An example is - right now - the number shows 12,010 - I have no idea
> > why. Another example is bookmarks labels changing - and even,  
> rarely,
> > the bookmark's url getting temporarily corrupted. I don't bother  
> with
> > refresh - sometimes, ironically enough - it's buggy too and doesn't
> > work. I have to stop what I'm doing and restart Firefox.
> >
> > A year ago I did an exhaustive search and Gmarks was - far and  
> away -
> > the best.
> >
> > I imagine that's probably still the case. But - starting today - I'm
> > going to start looking again...
> >
> > ===
> >
> > Also - this forum is starting to get filled with spam.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GMarks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/GMarks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to