Yes. That looks like one of my older tests and it doesn't have a SetSeed or some of the other improvements I've been making recently. I made a couple changes locally that should improve the performance once the test repo is unfrozen. If you just try running that one again, it might pass (no guarantees).
-----Original Message----- From: Darrel Conway [mailto:djci...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:42 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) <d.s.coo...@nasa.gov>; Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] <steven.e.slojkow...@nasa.gov>; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net; Hughes, Steven P. (GSFC-5950) <steven.p.hug...@nasa.gov> Subject: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2018-02-20 (Houndstooth/Ubuntu-Linux/GmatConsole-64/M2017b/GCC5.4.0) Most recent test results (Ubuntu). There is one new failure on Ubuntu: ErrorModel_NoiseSigma_RangeRate2 This is a test case that uses simulate, then estimate. The result used in the comparator is the following string: WeightedRMS residuals for this iteration : 3.27938348922 The compatarator is looking for a value between 2.8x and 3.1x. We have 3.2x; I'm assuming this is a fragile test. Please confirm, Steve S. - DJC -- Darrel J. Conway, Ph.D. Thinking Systems, Inc. Senior Scientist and CEO 6441 N Camino Libby Phone: (623) 298-4530 Tucson, AZ 85718 FAX: (520) 232-2533 www.thinksysinc.com Cell: (520) 425-3626 d...@thinksysinc.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmat-buildtest
