Thanks for the discussion! The fun thing is that I'll try to deal with integers on the order of 200 decimals (figure on the order of 700 bits). I think that mini-gmp is billed as "several orders of magnitude slower" than gmp on numbers over a few hundred bits, so I'd still like to see what gmp does (with --disable-fft).
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM Torbjörn Granlund <[email protected]> wrote: > Marc Glisse <[email protected]> writes: > > We have --disable-fft, maybe the code in gmp-impl.h could be protected > by WANT_FFT. gmp_uint_least32_t also looks like it is unlikely to > hurt, and we are already using it for other bitfields in the same > file. > > Those changes could make sense whether we support 16 bit systems or not. > > Agreed with both suggestions. (Our usage of unsigned long as basetype > is not standards conformant, and it might not work on an environment > where int is just 2 bytes.) > > -- > Torbjörn > Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622 > _______________________________________________ gmp-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-bugs
