ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes: Can we document that mpn_sec_add_1_itch(n) <= n? I see no reason any implementation would need more scartch space, and this makes it possibly to skip the function call to the itch function if one is willing to always pass n limbs of scratch. E.g., if one has a dead area around anyway. This makes sense.
cy = mpn_addmul_1 (rp, rp + 4, (mp_limb_t) 19 << 1); We seem to have forgotten to document that that operand overlap is permitted. Perhas you could fix that too? (mpn_mul_1 has it, copying to addmul_1 and submul_1 would probably be sufficient.) Torbjörn Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622 _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel