All;

Let me try again.  How difficult would it be to modify GMSH to create a 
"Periodic Plane"?  Either a boolean switch could be set while doing a 
translate/rotate or the 2 planes could be grouped as a physical entity, which 
would be 2-D meshed once with the mesh elements copied to it's "periodic" 
brother.

Certainly, many problems have 180 degree rotational symmetry, and many RF 
devices (such as helix and coupled cavity TWTs and klystrons) have axial 
symmetry, magnetrons/CFAs have rotational symmetry to the vanes.  Mechanical 
structures with spokes would be greatly simplified with this symmetry.

It seems the switch used with a new "Periodic Plane" would be best, the 
translation matrix could be stored on generation and used immediately after 
mesh generation.

Thoughts?

   ...Dan

_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to