Christophe Geuzaine wrote: > Exactly: it's a very small change, only affecting the optional > $PhysicalNames/$EndPhysicalNames section. > > The problem was that with version 2, we did not save a dimension (0D, > 1D, 2D or 3D) together with the name. Hence we could not guarantee a > one-to-one mapping between physical names and physical numbers. Indeed, > physical numbers need only to be unique per dimension (you can have > Physical Point(1) and Physical Line(1)).
In that case is the definition of the new document format version still open to suggestions? Rui Maciel _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
