Dear GMSH authors, I've been using your excellent tool to construct some boundary element meshes. I was wondering if you would mind having a look at a short code I've used. I want to publish it in my next paper so that the reader may be able to compare methods and want it to be as short, elegant, and correct (!) as possible. One problem that I see in the mesh that I'm getting is that some of the triangles are not well oriented (as in the current experiments I do not need the normal derivative it did not make a difference).
The whole paper is at : http://www.mis.mpg.de/publications/preprints/2009/prepr2009-58.html and the short code is here (followed by "mesh 2D" to construct the mesh): refine = 0.05; Point(1) = {-0.5,-1/2,0,refine}; Point(2) = {-0.5,-3/4,0,refine}; Point(3) = {-0.5,-1,0,refine}; Point(4) = {0.0,-1,0,refine}; Point(5) = {0.0,0,0,refine}; Point(6) = {0.0,-0.5,0,refine}; Point(7) = {1.0,0.0,0,refine}; Point(8) = {0.5,0.0,0,refine}; Point(9) = {-.75,-.75,0,refine}; Circle(1) = {1,2,9}; Circle(2) = {9,2,3}; Circle(3) = {6,5,8}; Circle(4) = {4,5,7}; Line(5) = {3,4}; Line(6) = {6,1}; Extrude {{1,0,0}, {0,0,0}, Pi} { Line{3,6,1,2,5,4};} Extrude {{1,0,0}, {0,0,0}, Pi/2} { Line{26,22,18,14,10,7};} Extrude {{1,0,0}, {0,0,0}, Pi/2} { Line{36,32,40,44,48,29};} Thanks and best regards, Lehel ------------------------- Dr. Lehel Banjai Max-Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Inselstrasse 22 D-04103 Leipzig Germany tel: + 49 (0)341 9959754 fax: + 49 (0)341 9959658 _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
