Hi Shawn,

I think the best solution would be to define Surface 13 as a hole in Surface 18.

Regards,

Dave

--
David Colignon, Ph.D.
Collaborateur Logistique du F.R.S.-FNRS
CÉCI - Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif
ACE - Applied & Computational Electromagnetics
Sart-Tilman B28
Université de Liège
4000 Liège - BELGIQUE
Tél: +32 (0)4 366 37 32
Fax: +32 (0)4 366 29 10
WWW:    http://hpc.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/
Agenda: http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=david.colignon%40gmail.com



Shawn Fostner wrote:
Hi all,

A problem I thought I'd gotten around a while ago, but I guess not.

The geometry in question is a rectangular box (surface), with a second box immediately adjacent it (mostly empty space, but defines my meshing region). Now immediately above the surface there is a small region which I have been using to define a metal piece, it is entirely outside but just touching the surface (in the ideal case). Usually I use the metal as a void when I define the region above the surface (plus other objects, irrelevant here).

The problem is that if I don't leave a gap (even if tiny) between the metal and the surface then the 3d mesh invariably fails, but if I do leave a gap then it throws off the field calculation dramatically (because of small meshing volumes at the corner of that region). I can understand there would be a problem with a void that overlaps the boundary of a volume, or it might be because of the adjacent volume, but...

Now I guess I could deliberately eliminate any mesh elements in that gap between the void and surface, not sure how though. Otherwise, is there anything else I can try? Any suggestions would be great.

I've included a version of the geo file, ignore the extra structure. Currently there is a 0.01 unit gap between surface and metal (the object between surfaces 12 and 13.

Thanks!

Shawn


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh


_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to