Yes they are. BTW, using incomplete second order elements is OK. Nicolas
2011/3/11 Karin&NiKo <[email protected]> > Yes they are. > BTW, using incomplete second order elements is OK. > > Nicolas > > 2011/3/11 Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> > > On 11/03/11 09:47, Karin&NiKo wrote: >> >>> Dear Gmsh-ers, >>> >>> I would like to report a bug that appears with gmsh 2.5.0 and also in >>> the nightly build. >>> When trying to write the mesh generated by the attached script, a >>> segmentation fault occurs : >>> >>> /opt/gmsh-2.5.1-svn-Linux/bin/gmsh -2 -format med -o carre-Q2.mmed >>> carre.geo >>> >>> Please notice that : >>> - no problem occurs when using a first order mesh >>> - the unv format for the 2nd order mesh can be written but, when read >>> back in gmsh, the mesh is wrong >>> >>> >> Hi Nico - Indeed, it looks like 9-node quads I/O is not implemented for >> MED (nor UNV). I don't remember why I did not implement this... Are 9-node >> quads supported by MED? >> >> >> Nicolas >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gmsh mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh >>> >> >> >> -- >> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine >> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science >> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine >> > >
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
