Hi Ruth,
Thanks - that fixes my volume problem.
My other problem remains, though. I want to define geometry using a msh
file, and then create a mesh with new surface elements, not the ones I
am using for geometry surfaces. Is there a way to do this?
Wayne
On 3/23/12 2:09 PM, Ruth V. Sabariego wrote:
Hi Wayne,
You need to define the geometrical Volume:
Volume(11) = {10};
the Physical Volume is used just for tagging the elements and their
further use in a e.g. FE solver.
Regards,
Ruth
--
Dr. Ir. Ruth V. Sabariego
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering & Computer Science,
Applied & Computational Electromagnetics (ACE),
phone: +32-4-3663737 - fax: +32-4-3662910 -
http://ace.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/
On 23 Mar 2012, at 18:41, Wayne Christopher wrote:
I'm trying to mesh a volume defined by surfaces that are defined by
tessellations. I don't want the mesh to be based on the surface
triangles - those are purely geometry and in most cases finer than
the volume mesh that I want.
When I run gmsh like this:
gmsh try1.geo -3 -format msh -saveall -smooth 3 -o try1-out.gmsh
(files attached) I do not get any tetras in the output, and it
appears that the output mesh is a refinement of the input mesh.
What am I doing wrong? Thanks,
Wayne
<try1.geo><try1-geom.gmsh><try1-out.gmsh>_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
