Hi Mark, Thanks for the quick reply. That did the trick. Awesome!
Best, Bartek On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Mark Starnes <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Bartek, > > Yes: use a Physical Group definition in your .geo > file, like this: > > Physical Volume('tets') = {2}; > > where `2' in this case would be the volume number > assigned to your tetrahedra and 'tets' is a name I > made up. > > Adding a `Physical Group' definition results in > only the groups specified as being physical being > exported. > > Search for, `Physical' in the manual: > > http://www.geuz.org/gmsh/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html > > Best regards, > > Mark. > > > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 09:15:31AM +0200, Bartek Grychtol wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm new to gmsh, just seeing if it can do what I need. > > I have a surface mesh in an stl file. I need to create a nice > > tetrahedral volume mesh, > > but without changing anything on the surface. > > The sphere demo does exactly that. > > However, the generated .msh file contains both triangles (for the > > surface) and > > tetrahedra (for the volume inside). > > Is there a way (a command or file format) to have the complete mesh > > represented as tetrahedra only? > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Bartek > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gmsh mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > > -- > Dr. Mark Starnes > Principal Physicist > FT Technologies > Church Lane > Teddington > TW11 8PA > > web: www.fttech.co.uk > DDI: 0208 614 2730 >
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
