Dear, everyone
Does somebody know that how can i do the mesh using two different type shapes?
That is to say, as for the volume which has two parts. i want to mesh the top 
part using triangle and the bottom part is rectangle ?
how can i do it? i just can mesh using only one shape mesh////
thank you for your help.
cheers
On 2 Aug 2012, at 12:02, Serban Georgescu wrote:

> Thanks a lot!
> I have recompiled the svn version and now it works as fast as 2.5.
> This really helps me a great deal.
> 
> Cheers,
> Serban
> 
> 
> On 2 Aug 2012, at 11:16, Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 02 Aug 2012, at 10:00, Serban Georgescu 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Christophe,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the quick reply.
>>> I have tried "-v 3" but that removes almost all meshing output, including 
>>> information that is quite useful to me (e.g. time taken in 2D and 3D 
>>> meshing, time for optimization, resulting number of elements). So I was 
>>> looking for a way that removes that extra output and leaves just the 
>>> "important" information. Basically, I would like to get something like it 
>>> was for Gmsh 2.5, when Netgen was not that verbose.
>>> Do you know a way to do this?
>> 
>> I've removed the "testout" in svn; this should match what we did in 2.5.
>> 
>> Thanks for the feedback!
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks again!
>>> Serban
>>> 
>>> On 2 Aug 2012, at 07:20, Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Serban - Use "-v 3" ?
>>>> 
>>>> On 01 Aug 2012, at 14:39, Serban Georgescu 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am have been using Gmsh for an year or so with very good results (and I 
>>>>> am very grateful to the developers for the wonderful work).
>>>>> Recently, I switched to version 2.6 (from 2.5) and I found that for some 
>>>>> of the models the meshing time is much increased.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The main reason for this is the large amount of output that Netgen 
>>>>> generates.
>>>>> Basically, Netgen outputs loads of the following Info:
>>>>> 
>>>>> …
>>>>> Info    : Freezone:
>>>>> Info    : (0, 0, 0)
>>>>> Info    : (1.2, -5.5e-17, -3.1e-17)
>>>>> Info    : (-0.45, 1, 2.9e-18)
>>>>> Info    : (-2.3, 1.2, -0.31)
>>>>> Info    : (-0.54, 0.74, -0.1)
>>>>> Info    : (-0.96, 0.74, -0.1)
>>>>> Info    : (-0.38, 0.38, -0.1)
>>>>> Info    : Mapping found!!: Rule Tetrahedron Vis a Vis Point with 3 edges 
>>>>> (1)
>>>>> Info    : 3 1 2 7
>>>>> Info    : 3 = 3
>>>>> …
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here are some results for one of the models:
>>>>> Gmsh 2.5 -> ~ 6 sec
>>>>> Gmsh 2.6 with output redirected to file à ~ 11 sec
>>>>> Gmsh 2.6 with output redirected to /dev/nullà ~ 8 sec
>>>>> Gmsh 2.6 with manually editingcontrib/Netgen/nglib_gmsh.cpp  by 
>>>>> commenting line 75 (//testout = new ostream(new mystreambuf());) and 
>>>>> un-commenting  line 66 (testout = new ofstream ("test.out");) à ~ 5 sec
>>>>> 
>>>>> So basically, in this case, the extra verbosity from netgen makes the 
>>>>> mesher take twice as much.
>>>>> I have other cases where the increase is much larger.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My question (and wish) is:  would it be possible to connect this output 
>>>>> to the Gmsh verbosity argument (-v)?
>>>>> I would be quite happy to (at least try to) add this functionality myself 
>>>>> should somebody tell me how could I get access the verbosity value from 
>>>>> contrib/Netgen/nglib_gmsh.cpp .
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>> Serban
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gmsh mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
>>>> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
>>>> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
>> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
>> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to