On 04 Apr 2013, at 13:20, Martin Vymazal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Christophe, > > thank you for your quick reply. I guess I'll have to extract the boundary > elements outside of gmsh. > We should probably provide a Plugin that does that: we currently do it for post-processing datasets, we should do it simply for meshes... > Best regards, > > Martin Vymazal > > > On Thursday 04 April 2013 13:12:14 Christophe Geuzaine wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> The Reclassify tool is a tool to "reclassify" surface meshes; but there are >> no surface elements (triangle or quads) in your mesh... >> >> Christophe >> >> On 04 Apr 2013, at 11:36, Martin Vymazal <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Dear gmsh developers, >>> >>> I have a 3D flat plate grid downloaded from here: >>> http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/flatplate_grids.html (3D Plot3d grid, 2 x >>> 545 x 385 points). I converted the grid to vtk and also split the >>> hexahedra into tetra using paraview. I am not able to reclassify the >>> surface of the geometry to create physical surfaces (to be able to set >>> boundary conditions for my flow solver). The 'Reclassify' button in the >>> Reclassify2D dialog always remains greyed out, no matter what I do. Is it >>> a bug? If not, could you please tell me the settings you use to >>> reclassify the surface? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Martin >>> Vymazal<flatplate_clust2_tetra.vtk.gz><flatplate_clust2.vtk.gz>________ >>> _______________________________________> >>> gmsh mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > > _______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh -- Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
