On 24 Feb 2014, at 20:07, Willem Deconinck <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Thomas, > > First off, congratulations for the nice work on high-order boundary layers. > There are however a few things I noticed that were not working properly, and > I don't know if you are aware. > > I have tested following also with todays nightly build (24/02/2014) > > I found the high-order boundary layer optimization algorithm to work very > well for cases without subdivision algorithms. > However, when I recombine with "All Quads" subdivision algorithm, the > subdivision-node is not recognized to fall on the CAD edge for non-linear > boundaries. The high-order optimization algorithm also fails to correct for > this. > In attachment I send the geo file illustrating this problem, with a very > simple square geometry with a hole. > If I enlarge the hole, to a point there are no intersections, all is fine. > > > On another note, when I last spoke with you at VKI, I mentioned it would be > nice to have more parallel support for field visualisation in gmsh. > A parallel-aware file format e.g. which combines multiple ".msh" files > generated by a parallel simulation. > It would then e.g. combine all views that belong to the same field in one > view, and when options are modified for one, > it modifies it for all of them together. > I have tried to do this by creating a file "out.msh" with content > """ > Merge "out_P0.msh"; > Merge "out_P1.msh"; > Merge "out_P2.msh"; > Merge "out_P3.msh"; > """ Dear Willem, Just add a partition ID as a forth value in the list of integers describing the view; merging the different files will "complete" the view as they are loaded. (This is fully dynamic; you can load partial results/time steps; each result can also be based on a completely different mesh.) Hope this helps, Christophe > I thought perhaps "Combine elements by name" would then do the trick, > but I get "Combine space is not implemented for this kind of data". > Not sure how much work this involves, but that is really a must-have feature > to me. > The type of options I would modify on this parallel view would mostly be > "Adapt Visualization Mesh", and global Contour-Min-Max values. > > Best regards, > Willem > > <circle_bdry_layer.geo>_______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh -- Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
