> On 20 Jan 2015, at 17:19, Julian Dean <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear GMsh, > > I’ve created a collection of volumes (with coherence off) from a collection > of points, lines and surfaces. > I set, for example all the surfaces for volume 3 to a fine mesh on the > surface and edges. (using a math restrict applying it to a EdgesList and > FaceList.) > > When I then run coherence - which i need- obvious the shared surfaces > collapse. The issue is when i go on to mesh the structure not all the > surfaces of the volumes are attributed this fine mesh as obviously they have > change their ID number. > > Without having to go through all the surfaces manually and see which are > shared, apply the field to them as well (last resort) is there any sneaky way > i’m missing?
No, I don't think so; currently we update the "Physical" definitions after "Coherence" - I guess we should also update the field definitions. Or at least provide the "old_id<->new_id" map somehow. I'm adding this in our TODO list. > > best regards > > Julian > _______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh -- Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
